Export limit exceeded: 17775 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (17775 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2022-37053 1 Trendnet 2 Tew733gr, Tew733gr Firmware 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
TRENDnet TEW733GR v1.03B01 is vulnerable to Command injection via /htdocs/upnpinc/gena.php.
CVE-2022-37041 1 Zimbra 1 Collaboration 2024-11-21 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in ProxyServlet.java in the /proxy servlet in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. The value of the X-Forwarded-Host header overwrites the value of the Host header in proxied requests. The value of X-Forwarded-Host header is not checked against the whitelist of hosts that ZCS is allowed to proxy to (the zimbraProxyAllowedDomains setting).
CVE-2022-37009 1 Jetbrains 1 Intellij Idea 2024-11-21 3.9 Low
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2022.2 local code execution via a Vagrant executable was possible
CVE-2022-36997 1 Veritas 4 Flex Appliance, Flex Scale, Netbackup and 1 more 2024-11-21 7.1 High
An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup 8.1.x through 8.1.2, 8.2, 8.3.x through 8.3.0.2, 9.x through 9.0.0.1, and 9.1.x through 9.1.0.1 (and related NetBackup products). An attacker with authenticated access to a NetBackup Client could remotely trigger impacts that include arbitrary file read, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), and denial of service.
CVE-2022-36830 1 Samsung 2 Charm, Charm Firmware 2024-11-21 6.2 Medium
PendingIntent hijacking vulnerability in cancelAlarmManager in Charm by Samsung prior to version 1.2.3 allows local attackers to access files without permission via implicit intent.
CVE-2022-36829 1 Samsung 2 Charm, Charm Firmware 2024-11-21 6.2 Medium
PendingIntent hijacking vulnerability in releaseAlarm in Charm by Samsung prior to version 1.2.3 allows local attackers to access files without permission via implicit intent.
CVE-2022-36802 1 Atlassian 1 Jira Align 2024-11-21 4.9 Medium
The ManageJiraConnectors API in Atlassian Jira Align before version 10.109.2 allows remote attackers to exploit this issue to access internal network resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery. This can be exploited by a remote, unauthenticated attacker with Super Admin privileges by sending a specially crafted HTTP request.
CVE-2022-36799 1 Atlassian 2 Jira Data Center, Jira Server 2024-11-21 7.2 High
This issue exists to document that a security improvement in the way that Jira Server and Data Center use templates has been implemented. Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allowed remote attackers with system administrator permissions to execute arbitrary code via Template Injection leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the Email Templates feature. In this case the security improvement was to protect against using the XStream library to be able to execute arbitrary code in velocity templates. The affected versions are before version 8.13.19, from version 8.14.0 before 8.20.7, and from version 8.21.0 before 8.22.1.
CVE-2022-36756 1 Dlink 2 Dir-845l, Dir-845l Firmware 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
DIR845L A1 v1.00-v1.03 is vulnerable to command injection via /htdocs/upnpinc/gena.php.
CVE-2022-36663 1 Gluu 1 Oxauth 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter.
CVE-2022-36551 1 Heartex 1 Label Studio 2024-11-21 6.5 Medium
A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Data Import module in Heartex - Label Studio Community Edition versions 1.5.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user to access arbitrary files on the system. Furthermore, self-registration is enabled by default in these versions of Label Studio enabling a remote attacker to create a new account and then exploit the SSRF.
CVE-2022-36429 1 Netgear 2 Rbs750, Rbs750 Firmware 2024-11-21 7.2 High
A command execution vulnerability exists in the ubus backend communications functionality of Netgear Orbi Satellite RBS750 4.6.8.5. A specially-crafted JSON object can lead to arbitrary command execution. An attacker can send a sequence of malicious packets to trigger this vulnerability.
CVE-2022-36372 1 Intel 69 Bios, Nuc 8 Compute Element Cm8ccb4r, Nuc 8 Compute Element Cm8ccb4r Firmware and 66 more 2024-11-21 7.5 High
Improper buffer restrictions in some Intel(R) NUC BIOS firmware may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2022-36262 1 Taogogo 1 Taocms 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in taocms 3.0.2. in the website settings that allows arbitrary php code to be injected by modifying config.php.
CVE-2022-36216 1 Dedecms 1 Dedecms 2024-11-21 7.2 High
DedeCMS v5.7.94 - v5.7.97 was discovered to contain a remote code execution vulnerability in member_toadmin.php.
CVE-2022-35847 1 Fortinet 1 Fortisoar 2024-11-21 6.3 Medium
An improper neutralization of special elements used in a template engine vulnerability [CWE-1336] in FortiSOAR management interface 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4.0 through 6.4.4 may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload.
CVE-2022-35649 2 Fedoraproject, Moodle 2 Fedora, Moodle 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
The vulnerability was found in Moodle, occurs due to improper input validation when parsing PostScript code. An omitted execution parameter results in a remote code execution risk for sites running GhostScript versions older than 9.50. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may result in complete compromise of vulnerable system.
CVE-2022-35516 1 Dedecms 1 Dedecms 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
DedeCMS v5.7.93 - v5.7.96 was discovered to contain a remote code execution vulnerability in login.php.
CVE-2022-35513 1 Blink1 1 Blink1control2 2024-11-21 7.5 High
The Blink1Control2 application <= 2.2.7 uses weak password encryption and an insecure method of storage.
CVE-2022-35414 2 Debian, Qemu 2 Debian Linux, Qemu 2024-11-21 8.8 High
softmmu/physmem.c in QEMU through 7.0.0 can perform an uninitialized read on the translate_fail path, leading to an io_readx or io_writex crash. NOTE: a third party states that the Non-virtualization Use Case in the qemu.org reference applies here, i.e., "Bugs affecting the non-virtualization use case are not considered security bugs at this time.