Export limit exceeded: 111168 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (111168 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-103418 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox For Ios | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| Firefox for iOS directly interpolated the page’s HTML language attribute into translation JavaScript, allowing attacker-controlled markup to execute code in Firefox’s privileged content world and bypass the page’s Content Security Policy. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox for iOS 157.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102075 | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product web service does not properly validate user input in multipart handling. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75352 | 1 Eipstackgroup | 1 Opener | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| OpENer v2.3/commit 76b95cf, contains an integer underflow in the server-side EtherNet/IP ForwardOpen connection-path parser. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2026-96266 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powervm Hypervisor | 2026-10-13 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1060.00 through FW1060.81 is affected by a vulnerability in host firmware configuration parsing. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can write specially crafted configuration data to cause memory corruption in the host firmware boot stage during system IPL, compromising the host firmware boot stack and the hypervisor subsequently loaded by it. Successful exploitation results in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96265 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powervm Hypervisor | 2026-10-13 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1060.00 through FW1060.81 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can send a specially crafted mailbox message to read or modify arbitrary regions of Hostboot memory, compromising the host firmware boot stack and the hypervisor subsequently loaded by it. Successful exploitation results in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96264 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powervm Hypervisor | 2026-10-13 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1060.00 through FW1060.81 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can send a specially crafted mailbox message to overflow host firmware runtime attribute storage, allowing arbitrary code to be executed in the host firmware runtime. This gives the attacker full access to the managed system's memory and hardware interfaces, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96263 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powervm Hypervisor | 2026-10-13 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00 through FW1120.01, FW1110.00 through FW1110.31, and FW1060.00 through FW1060.81 is affected by a vulnerability in the host firmware boot process image validation path. An attacker with service access to the service processor can supply a maliciously crafted code update image, allowing arbitrary code to be executed on the host system. Successful exploitation could result in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the affected host system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96262 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powervm Hypervisor | 2026-10-13 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1060.00 through FW1060.81 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can send a specially crafted mailbox message to overflow host firmware runtime attribute storage, allowing arbitrary code to be executed in the host firmware runtime. This gives the attacker full access to the managed system's memory and hardware interfaces, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12780 | 1 Aomei | 1 Backupper | 2026-10-13 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability was determined in AOMEI Backupper up to 8.3.0. Impacted is an unknown function in the library amwrtdrv.sys of the component Kernel Driver. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper access controls. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108549 | 1 Chenhg5 | 1 Cc-connect | 2026-10-13 | 8.1 High |
| cc-connect through 1.5.0 contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the MAX platform adapter webhook mode in platform/max/max.go that accepts unauthenticated updates when no webhook_secret is configured. Remote attackers reaching the webhook listener on port 8080 can forge updates with an allowed or admin user_id to run privileged commands like /shell on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105465 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to privilege escalation when db2locssh is enabled with the db2 instance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105464 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103903 | 1 Mikrotik | 1 Routeros | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| An incorrect authorization vulnerability in the WinBox authentication flow of MikroTik RouterOS allows a remote authenticated attacker with credentials for a low-privilege account permitted to use WinBox to obtain the authorization policy of a different existing account. The stage-one EC-SRP challenge and proof are verified using the attacker's account, while the independently supplied stage-two username is used to install the target account's privileges. By specifying a higher-privilege account such as admin, a low-privilege user can obtain a full administrative session without knowing the target account's password and can use that session to increase the privileges of the attacker's own account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102117 | 2 Accellion, Kiteworks | 2 Kiteworks, Core | 2026-10-13 | 7.2 High |
| On deployments where the remote-support capability is licensed and enabled, an authenticated System Administrator who also possessed the key protecting the submitted data could redirect the underlying system's outbound support connection to a destination of their choosing. That destination could then have operating-system commands executed on the node and receive their output, potentially resulting in remote code execution with the privileges of a local service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102119 | 2 Accellion, Kiteworks | 2 Kiteworks, Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-13 | 7.2 High |
| A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102143 | 2 Accellion, Kiteworks | 2 Kiteworks, Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handler that did not properly authenticate the request. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to place the file in an executable location. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67792 | 2 Drivelock, Microsoft | 2 Drivelock, Windows | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 before 24.1.6, 24.2 before 24.2.7, and 25.1 before 25.1.5. Local unprivileged users can manipulate a DriveLock process to execute arbitrary commands on Windows computers. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40946 | 1 Siemens | 30 Blueplanet 100 Nx3 M8, Blueplanet 100 Tl3 Gen2, Blueplanet 105 Tl3 and 27 more | 2026-10-13 | 8.3 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in blueplanet 100 NX3 M8 (All versions), blueplanet 100 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 105 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 105 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 110 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 NX3 M10 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 137 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 155 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 155 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 165 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 165 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 3.0 TL3-60.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet gridsave 110 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsave 137 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsave 92.0 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91). A CRC16-based algorithm for generating Technical Service credentials could allow an attacker to derive the credentials from the devices serial number and misuse them to gain unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40816 | 1 Siemens | 2 Logo!, Siplus Logo! | 2026-10-13 | 7.6 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not conduct certain validations when interacting with them. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to manipulate the devices IP address, which means the device would not be reachable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40815 | 1 Siemens | 2 Logo!, Siplus Logo! | 2026-10-13 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not properly validate the structure of TCP packets in several methods. This could allow an attacker to cause buffer overflows, get control over the instruction counter and run custom code. | ||||