Export limit exceeded: 18123 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (18123 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-47190 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low | ||
| Northern.tech Hosted Mender before 2024.07.11 allows SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6726 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Versions of Delphix Engine prior to Release 25.0.0.0 contain a flaw which results in Remote Code Execution (RCE). | ||||
| CVE-2024-6507 | 1 Deeplake | 1 Deeplake | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Command injection when ingesting a remote Kaggle dataset due to a lack of input sanitization in the ingest_kaggle() API | ||||
| CVE-2024-49201 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Keyfactor Remote File Orchestrator (aka remote-file-orchestrator) 2.8 before 2.8.1 allows Information Disclosure: sensitive information could be exposed at the debug logging level. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49214 | 1 Haproxy | 1 Haproxy | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| QUIC in HAProxy 3.1.x before 3.1-dev7, 3.0.x before 3.0.5, and 2.9.x before 2.9.11 allows opening a 0-RTT session with a spoofed IP address. This can bypass the IP allow/block list functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5743 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An attacker could exploit the 'Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort' vulnerability in EveHome Eve Play to execute arbitrary code. This issue affects Eve Play: through 1.1.42. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57401 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| SQL Injection vulnerability in Uniclare Student portal v.2 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Forgot Password function. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57061 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in Termius Version 9.9.0 through v.9.16.0 allows a physically proximate attacker to execute arbitrary code via the insecure Electron Fuses configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50611 | 1 Cyclonedx | 1 Cdxgen | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| CycloneDX cdxgen through 10.10.7, when run against an untrusted codebase, may execute code contained within build-related files such as build.gradle.kts, a similar issue to CVE-2022-24441. cdxgen is used by, for example, OWASP dep-scan. NOTE: this has been characterized as a design limitation, rather than an implementation mistake. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50636 | 1 Schrodinger | 1 Pymol | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| PyMOL 2.5.0 contains a vulnerability in its "Run Script" function, which allows the execution of arbitrary Python code embedded within .PYM files. Attackers can craft a malicious .PYM file containing a Python reverse shell payload and exploit the function to achieve Remote Command Execution (RCE). This vulnerability arises because PyMOL treats .PYM files as Python scripts without properly validating or restricting the commands within the script, enabling attackers to run unauthorized commands in the context of the user running the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5706 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the input before it is used as an identifier for a resource that may be outside the intended sphere of control. (CWE-99) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not restrict JNDI identifiers during the creation of Community Dashboards, allowing control of system-level data sources. An attacker could gain access to or modify sensitive data or system resources. This could allow access to protected files or directories including configuration files and files containing sensitive information, which can lead to remote code execution by unauthorized users. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51980 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing ReplyTo element in a Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) SOAP request. The attacker can not control the data sent in the SSRF connection, nor can the attacker receive any data back. This SSRF is suitable for TCP port scanning of an internal network when the Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) is exposed across a network segment. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51981 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56972 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An issue in Midea Group Co., Ltd Midea Home iOS 9.3.12 allows attackers to access sensitive user information via supplying a crafted link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56971 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An issue in Zhiyuan Yuedu (Guangzhou) Literature Information Technology Co., Ltd Shuqi Novel iOS 5.3.8 allows attackers to access sensitive user information via supplying a crafted link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52288 | 2026-04-15 | 5.1 Medium | ||
| libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. In affected versions an unexpected `REPLY_CCRYPT` or `REPLY_RMAC_I` may be introduced into an active stream when they should not be. Once RMAC_I message can be sent during a session, attacker with MITM access to the communication may intercept the original RMAC_I reply and save it. While the session continues, the attacker will record all of the replies and save them, till capturing the message to be replied (can be detected by ID, length or time based on inspection of visual activity next to the reader) Once attacker captures a session with the message to be replayed, he stops resetting the connection and waits for signal to perform the replay to of the PD to CP message (ex: by signaling remotely to the MIMT device or setting a specific timing). In order to replay, the attacker will craft a specific RMAC_I message in the proper seq of the execution, which will result in reverting the RMAC to the beginning of the session. At that phase - attacker can replay all the messages from the beginning of the session. This issue has been addressed in commit `298576d9` which is included in release version 3.0.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56969 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An issue in Pixocial Technology (Singapore) Pte. Ltd BeautyPlus iOS 7.8.010 allows attackers to access sensitive user information via supplying a crafted link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54125 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper authorization in handler for custom URL scheme issue in "Shonen Jump+" App for Android versions prior to 4.0.0 allows an attacker to lead a user to access an arbitrary website via the vulnerable App. As a result, the user may become a victim of a phishing attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54152 | 1 Peerigon | 1 Angular-expressions | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Angular Expressions provides expressions for the Angular.JS web framework as a standalone module. Prior to version 1.4.3, an attacker can write a malicious expression that escapes the sandbox to execute arbitrary code on the system. With a more complex (undisclosed) payload, one can get full access to Arbitrary code execution on the system. The problem has been patched in version 1.4.3 of Angular Expressions. Two possible workarounds are available. One may either disable access to `__proto__` globally or make sure that one uses the function with just one argument. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54197 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| SAP NetWeaver Administrator(System Overview) allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate accessible HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which could have a low impact on integrity and confidentiality of data. It has no impact on availability of the application. | ||||