Export limit exceeded: 51465 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11026 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11026 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-44113 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Due to missing authorization checks, SAP Business Warehouse (BEx Analyzer) allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4409 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP-ViperGB plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving plugin settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12771 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.43. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'customer_panel_password_reset' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the password of any administrator or customer account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12646 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| The topm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12645 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The topm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection for the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains a Relative Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to read arbitrary files on the user's system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12644 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| The tbm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability. Attackers can copy arbitrary files on the user's system and paste them into any path, which poses a potential risk of information leakage or could consume hard drive space by copying files in large volumes. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12643 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| The tbm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system. | ||||
| CVE-2020-28398 | 1 Siemens | 11 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re, Ruggedcom Rox Rx1400 and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The CLI feature in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This could allow an attacker to read or modify the device configuration by tricking an authenticated legitimate user into accessing a malicious link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12636 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Privacy Policy Generator, Terms & Conditions Generator WordPress Plugin : WP Legal Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'create_popup_delete_process' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete popups via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12634 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Related Posts, Inline Related Posts, Contextual Related Posts, Related Content By PickPlugins plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including 2.0.59. This is due to missing nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12605 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The AI Scribe – SEO AI Writer, Content Generator, Humanizer, Blog Writer, SEO Optimizer, DALLE-3, AI WordPress Plugin ChatGPT (GPT-4o 128K) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the "al_scribe_content_data" actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22438 | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820 Network switches. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to allow execution of malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11813 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Pulsating Chat Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amin_chat_button_settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11812 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Wtyczka SeoPilot dla WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.091. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the SeoPilot_Admin_Options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36839 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11689 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The HQ Rental Software plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the displaySettingsPage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36906 | 1 P5 | 2 Fnip-4xsh, Fnip-8x16a | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted form. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11071 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability in local API server of DestinyECM solution(versions described below) which is developed and maintained by Cyberdigm may allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, which probabilistically enables JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) via forgery web page.* Due to product customization, version information may differ from the following version description. For further inquiries, please contact the vendor. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11206 | 1 Tecno | 1 Com.transsion.phoenix | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthorized access vulnerability in the mobile application (com.transsion.phoenix) can lead to the leakage of user information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27901 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| SAP Asset Accounting could allow a high privileged attacker to exploit insufficient validation of path information provided by the users and pass it through to the file API's. Thus, causing a considerable impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application. | ||||