Export limit exceeded: 16117 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16117 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18423 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-21 | 7.1 High |
| Concrete CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.2 is vulnerable to Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the Express saved search preset delete and edit dialogs . An authenticated user holding only view permission on a single Express entity could therefore permanently delete, with no undo, or rename saved search presets owned by Express entities for which they had no permission, and a renamed preset name was displayed back to users of the targeted entity, enabling defacement or social engineering. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yalguun Tumenkhuu ( fg0x0 ) for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92122 | 2 Jenkins, Jenkins Project | 2 Script Security, Jenkins Script Security Plugin | 2026-09-21 | 8.8 High |
| Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not check the method called through the proxy created when a sandboxed script coerces a value to an interface, if the value inherits a method of the same name as an interface method, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92123 | 2 Jenkins, Jenkins Project | 2 Script Security, Jenkins Script Security Plugin | 2026-09-21 | 8.8 High |
| Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not intercept operations performed on a null receiver (method calls, property and attribute accesses, and array accesses), allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92124 | 2 Jenkins, Jenkins Project | 2 Script Security, Jenkins Script Security Plugin | 2026-09-21 | 8.8 High |
| Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier checks the operations Groovy will perform with the elements it reads from a collection that a sandboxed script casts to another type but performs the cast on the collection itself, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91099 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6862 | 2 Redhat, Ubuntu | 5 Enterprise Linux, Hummingbird, Openshift and 2 more | 2026-09-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libefiboot, a component of efivar. The device path node parser in libefiboot fails to validate that each node's Length field is at least 4 bytes, which is the minimum size for an EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) device path node header. A local user could exploit this vulnerability by providing a specially crafted device path node. This can lead to infinite recursion, causing stack exhaustion and a process crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-0186 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| In ac_init_one_sswrp of init.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0187 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| In gsa_sw_pk_hash_compare of image-auth-srv.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0189 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 8.4 High |
| In ac_init_policy of init.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55302 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55304 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| In addr_remap_address_map of remap.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55359 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55366 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible authentication bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56881 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 8.4 High |
| In enable_segment of remap.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93871 | 1 Cotonti | 3 Cotonti, Cotonti Siena, Siena | 2026-09-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate redirect destinations in page bodies prefixed with redir:, allowing authenticated users with page creation or edit permissions to store redirects to arbitrary external hosts. Attackers can craft pages on trusted domains that redirect visitors to malicious sites for phishing attacks without administrative privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83237 | 1 Oracle | 2 Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager, Commerce Guided Search \/ Oracle Commerce Experience Manager | 2026-09-21 | 7.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager product of Oracle Commerce (component: Forge). The supported version that is affected is 11.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2026-56941 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 8.4 High |
| In multiple functions of fpc_tee_hal.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56914 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-21 | 8.4 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92129 | 2 Jenkins, Jenkins Project | 2 Script Security, Jenkins Script Security Plugin | 2026-09-21 | 7.5 High |
| Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not check calls from sandboxed scripts to methods added dynamically to a class at runtime, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute code outside the sandbox. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94393 | 1 Misp | 1 Misp | 2026-09-21 | N/A |
| When a user creates or edits a report inside an event, MISP can identify an existing report using its UUID without properly checking whether that report actually belongs to the same event. As a result, a user who has editing rights on one event could potentially move a report from another event into their own event, as long as they know or can guess the report’s UUID. Once moved, they could view and change information that they were not originally allowed to access. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have editor access to at least one event and to know or discover a valid report UUID. The main impact is that private event reports could be exposed or modified across event boundaries, bypassing MISP’s normal access restrictions. Version affected: <2.5.47 | ||||