| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper handling of insufficiency privileges in the ASP could allow a privileged attacker to modify Translation Map Registers (TMRs) potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or integrity. |
| A DLL hijacking vulnerability in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper restriction of operations in the IOMMU could allow a malicious hypervisor to access guest private memory resulting in loss of integrity. |
| An out of bounds write in the Linux graphics driver could allow an attacker to overflow the buffer potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| An unintended proxy or intermediary in the AMD power management firmware (PMFW) could allow a privileged attacker to send malformed messages to the system management unit (SMU) potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper input validation within RAS TA Driver can allow a local attacker to access out-of-bounds memory, potentially resulting in a denial-of-service condition. |
| Type confusion in the ASP could allow an attacker to pass a malformed argument to the Reliability, Availability, and Serviceability trusted application (RAS TA) potentially leading to a read or write to shared memory resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| Improper key usage control in AMD Secure Processor
(ASP) may allow an attacker with local access who has gained arbitrary code
execution privilege in ASP to
extract ASP cryptographic keys, potentially resulting in loss of
confidentiality and integrity. |
| Failure to validate the address and size in TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) may allow a malicious x86 attacker to send malformed messages to the graphics mailbox resulting in an overlap of a TMR (Trusted Memory Region) that was previously allocated by the ASP bootloader leading to a potential loss of integrity. |
| Improper access control in secure encrypted virtualization (SEV) could allow a privileged attacker to write to the reverse map page (RMP) during secure nested paging (SNP) initialization, potentially resulting in a loss of guest memory confidentiality and integrity. |
| Improper input validation in system management mode (SMM) could allow a privileged attacker to overwrite stack memory leading to arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper Initialization within the AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware can allow an admin privileged attacker to corrupt RMP covered memory, potentially resulting in loss of guest memory integrity |
| Improper input validation for DIMM serial presence detect (SPD) metadata could allow an attacker with physical access, ring0 access on a system with a non-compliant DIMM, or control over the Root of Trust for BIOS update, to bypass SMM isolation potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution at the SMM level. |
| Improper access control in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to bypass RMP protections, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity. |
| Improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer in PCIe® Link could allow an attacker with access to a guest virtual machine to potentially perform a denial of service attack against the host resulting in loss of availability. |
| A DLL hijacking vulnerability in Vivado could allow a local attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification in SEV firmware could allow a privileged attacker to downgrade firmware potentially resulting in a loss of integrity. |
| Improper validation of an array index in the AMD graphics driver software could allow an attacker to pass malformed arguments to the dynamic power management (DPM) functions resulting in an out of bounds read and loss of availability. |
| Improper input validation in AMD Graphics Driver could allow a local attacker to write out of bounds, potentially resulting in loss of integrity or denial of service. |
| Insufficient bounds checking in AMD TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) could allow an attacker with a compromised userspace to invoke a command with malformed arguments leading to out of bounds memory access, potentially resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
