Export limit exceeded: 414342 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2529 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-1067 | 1 Apple | 3 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Secure Transport in Apple iOS before 8.2, Apple OS X through 10.10.2, and Apple TV before 7.1 does not properly restrict TLS state transitions, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks to EXPORT_RSA ciphers via crafted TLS traffic, related to the "FREAK" issue, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0204 and CVE-2015-1637. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1129 | 1 Apple | 2 Iphone Os, Safari | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apple Safari before 6.2.5, 7.x before 7.1.5, and 8.x before 8.0.5 does not properly select X.509 client certificates, which makes it easier for remote attackers to track users via a crafted web site. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1145 | 1 Apple | 1 Mac Os X | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Code Signing implementation in Apple OS X before 10.10.3 does not properly validate signatures, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted bundle, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1146. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1146 | 1 Apple | 1 Mac Os X | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Code Signing implementation in Apple OS X before 10.10.3 does not properly validate signatures, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted bundle, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1145. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1355 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simatic Step 7 | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Siemens SIMATIC STEP 7 (TIA Portal) before 13 SP1 uses a weak password-hash algorithm, which makes it easier for local users to determine cleartext passwords by reading a project file and conducting a brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1358 | 1 Siemens | 1 Wincc | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The remote-management module in the (1) Multi Panels, (2) Comfort Panels, and (3) RT Advanced functionality in Siemens SIMATIC WinCC (TIA Portal) before 13 SP1 and in the (4) panels and (5) runtime functionality in SIMATIC WinCC flexible before 2008 SP3 Up7 does not properly encrypt credentials in transit, which makes it easier for remote attackers to determine cleartext credentials by sniffing the network and conducting a decryption attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1453 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The qm class in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android uses a hardcoded encryption key of FoRtInEt!AnDrOiD, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain passwords and possibly other sensitive data by leveraging the key to decrypt data in the Shared Preferences. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1454 | 1 Bluecoat | 2 Proxyclient, Unified Agent | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Blue Coat ProxyClient before 3.3.3.3 and 3.4.x before 3.4.4.10 and Unified Agent before 4.1.3.151952 does not properly validate certain certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof ProxySG Client Managers, and consequently modify configurations and execute arbitrary software updates, via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1570 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Endpoint Control protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android and 5.2.028 for iOS does not validate certificates, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1571 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key. NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says "The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2730 | 5 Debian, Mozilla, Novell and 2 more | 10 Debian Linux, Firefox, Firefox Esr and 7 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.19.1, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 39.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.8 and 38.x before 38.1, and other products, does not properly perform Elliptical Curve Cryptography (ECC) multiplications, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof ECDSA signatures via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2741 | 3 Mozilla, Oracle, Redhat | 4 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Solaris and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Mozilla Firefox before 39.0, Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.1, and Thunderbird before 38.1 do not enforce key pinning upon encountering an X.509 certificate problem that generates a user dialog, which allows user-assisted man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by triggering a (1) expired certificate or (2) mismatched hostname for a domain with pinning enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2859 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Epolicy Orchestrator | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Intel McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 4.x through 4.6.9 and 5.x through 5.1.2 does not validate server names and Certification Authority names in X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2902 | 1 Hp | 1 Arcsight Smartconnectors | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| HP ArcSight SmartConnectors before 7.1.6 do not verify X.509 certificates from Logger devices, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof devices and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3008 | 1 Digium | 2 Asterisk, Certified Asterisk | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Asterisk Open Source 1.8 before 1.8.32.3, 11.x before 11.17.1, 12.x before 12.8.2, and 13.x before 13.3.2 and Certified Asterisk 1.8.28 before 1.8.28-cert5, 11.6 before 11.6-cert11, and 13.1 before 13.1-cert2, when registering a SIP TLS device, does not properly handle a null byte in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4458 | 1 Cisco | 1 Adaptive Security Appliance Software | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The TLS implementation in the Cavium cryptographic-module firmware, as distributed with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.1(5.21) and other products, does not verify the MAC field, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets, aka Bug ID CSCuu52976. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4550 | 1 Cisco | 1 Adaptive Security Appliance Software | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Cavium cryptographic-module firmware on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) devices with software 9.3(3) and 9.4(1.1) does not verify the AES-GCM Integrity Check Value (ICV) octets, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof IPSec and IKEv2 traffic by modifying packet data, aka Bug ID CSCuu66218. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4637 | 1 F5 | 4 Big-iq Adc, Big-iq Cloud, Big-iq Device and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The REST API in F5 BIG-IQ Cloud, Device, and Security 4.4.0 and 4.5.0 before HF2 and ADC 4.5.0 before HF2, when configured for LDAP remote authentication and the LDAP server allows anonymous BIND operations, allows remote attackers to obtain an authentication token for arbitrary users by guessing an LDAP user account name. | ||||
| CVE-2015-6112 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| SChannel in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 lacks the required extended master-secret binding support to ensure that a server's X.509 certificate is the same during renegotiation as it was before renegotiation, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information or modify TLS session data via a "triple handshake attack," aka "Schannel TLS Triple Handshake Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2015-7286 | 1 Csl Dualcom | 2 Gprs, Gprs Cs2300-r Firmware | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| CSL DualCom GPRS CS2300-R devices with firmware 1.25 through 3.53 rely on a polyalphabetic substitution cipher with hardcoded keys, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat a cryptographic protection mechanism by capturing IP or V.22bis PSTN protocol traffic. | ||||