Export limit exceeded: 414288 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (8712 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-49249 | 1 Malach-it | 1 Boruta-server | 2026-09-03 | N/A |
| Boruta is a standalone authorization server that aims to implement OAuth 2.0 and Openid Connect up to decentralized identity specifications. Prior to version 0.10.0, BorutaIdentityWeb.UserSettingsController.update/2 atomizes every key of the user-supplied request body via String.to_atom/1 before any validation. Because String.to_atom interns atoms permanently in the BEAM atom table (default cap 1,048,576 atoms; ERL_MAX_ATOMS), any authenticated end user can send PUT /users/settings with a user[<fresh-key>]=... body containing fresh keys per request and exhaust the global VM atom table. Once the table is full, the BEAM aborts with no more index entries in atom_tab and the entire OIDC server (auth, admin, gateway apps in the umbrella) crashes. The route is protected only by require_authenticated_user and a per-IP rate limit of 10 requests/second; a logged-in end user can hit it. The keys are atomized unconditionally before the downstream Accounts.update_user/6 call, so even failing updates contribute to exhaustion. This issue has been patched in version 0.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10195 | 2 Fs-code, Wordpress | 2 Fs Poster - Wordpress Social Media Auto Poster & Scheduler [facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Pinterest], Wordpress | 2026-09-02 | 8.8 High |
| The FS-Poster plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in versions up to and including 8.0.1. This is due to insufficient input sanitization of the FFmpeg path parameter before passing it to the exec() function, combined with missing authorization checks on the REST API endpoints. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73709 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 2 Fabric Composer, Fabric Composer | 2026-09-02 | 8.3 High |
| A vulnerability in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73722 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 2 Fabric Composer, Fabric Composer | 2026-09-02 | 7.2 High |
| Command injection vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform command injection against the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47891 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2026-09-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Spring WebFlux application that relies on the Aalto XML processor to parse XML input does not correctly enforce the maxInMemorySize limit. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier | ||||
| CVE-2026-59289 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring For Graphql, Spring For Graphql | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| Spring for GraphQL's Spring Data pagination support resolves arguments of a scrollable query and forwards the client-supplied values to the underlying repository. An attacker can forge a malicious query for a Connection field that can exhaust application memory or place significant, prolonged load on the underlying datastore, resulting in a Denial of Service. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.2.0 - 1.3.9 | ||||
| CVE-2026-59287 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring For Graphql, Spring For Graphql | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Spring for GraphQL is vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when using the WebSocket client with keepAlive enabled. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.3.0 - 1.3.9 | ||||
| CVE-2026-47861 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring Integration, Spring Integration | 2026-09-02 | 6.3 Medium |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker who can send a single UDP packet to a Spring Integration UDP inbound adapter can cause the server to emit an outbound UDP datagram to an arbitrary internal or external host and port of the attacker's choosing. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier | ||||
| CVE-2026-47874 | 2 Pivotal, Spring | 2 Reactor Netty, Reactor Netty | 2026-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| The vulnerability occurs when a client sends HTTP/1.1 pipelined requests over a single connection, causing the Reactor Netty HTTP server to consume an excessive amount of memory. Reactor Netty 1.3.0 - 1.3.6 Reactor Netty 1.1.0 - 1.2.18 Reactor Netty 1.0.52 and earlier | ||||
| CVE-2026-19474 | 1 Fastify | 1 Fastify-multipart | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| @fastify/multipart is a multipart form-data parser for Fastify. In versions from 3.0.0 up to but not including 10.1.1, request.saveRequestFiles() can leave completed temporary files on disk when a client disconnects while the parser is advancing between multipart parts. The iterator rejection that occurs between parts falls outside the per-file cleanup path, so an earlier completed file is never removed. An unauthenticated client can repeat this to cause persistent, linear disk consumption, leading to denial of service. This is an incomplete-fix variant of CVE-2025-24033. The issue is fixed in @fastify/multipart 10.1.1. Users should upgrade to 10.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58063 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Fips Java Api and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, BCFKS keystore load honours unbounded KDF cost from untrusted file. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-72682 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user holding only low, read-level Agent Builder privileges could submit a specially crafted request that causes Kibana to consume an unbounded amount of memory, terminating the process and denying service to all users of the instance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72652 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user can submit a specially crafted request that causes excessive resource consumption, which may render Kibana unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72659 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A specially crafted, malformed payload submitted to a Kibana visualization feature by an authenticated user holding only low-privileged access is not correctly validated before use. Processing the request causes unbounded memory growth in the Kibana process, which is terminated by the host once available memory is exhausted. Kibana then becomes unavailable to all users until the service is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72653 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user who is authorized to manage maintenance windows could submit a specially crafted, malformed payload that causes the Kibana process to consume excessive resources. Kibana becomes unresponsive for all users and does not recover without manual intervention. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72651 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user with read-only privileges to the alerting feature could submit a specially crafted, malformed payload that causes the Kibana process to consume excessive resources. A single request is sufficient to leave Kibana unable to serve requests for all users until the process is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49089 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A query expression accepted by a connector reporting operation was processed without any limit on its size, and an oversized expression caused the Kibana process to spend an unbounded amount of time evaluating it. An authenticated user with read-only privileges was able to send a single request that left Kibana unable to serve any user until the process was restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82691 | 1 D-link | 4 Dns-320l, Dns-327l, Dns-340l and 1 more | 2026-09-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DNS-320L, DNS-327L, DNS-340L and DNS-345 up to 20260717. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /cgi-bin/usb_device.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument f_ups_ip leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72667 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A specially crafted request submitted by an authenticated user with minimal privileges to a validation capability of the Observability log analysis feature causes Kibana to perform an unbounded amount of concurrent work. This can exhaust the memory available to the Kibana process and make Kibana unavailable to all users until it is restarted. The severity of the outcome depends on the resources allocated to the deployment; on well-provisioned deployments a single request may cause degraded performance and elevated memory pressure rather than a full outage, but the request is inexpensive to repeat. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33465 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user with low-level permissions could submit a specially crafted request that causes excessive resource consumption, which may render Kibana unavailable. | ||||