| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The vSphere Client (HTML5) contains a remote code execution vulnerability due to lack of input validation in the Virtual SAN Health Check plug-in which is enabled by default in vCenter Server. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 may exploit this issue to execute commands with unrestricted privileges on the underlying operating system that hosts vCenter Server. |
| In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| VMware Workspace ONE Access and Identity Manager contain a remote code execution vulnerability due to server-side template injection. A malicious actor with network access can trigger a server-side template injection that may result in remote code execution. |
| A vulnerability has been found in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /pages/supplier_add.php. The manipulation of the argument supp_name/supp_address leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Tomofun Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Account Handler. Such manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: init return value in amdgpu_ttm_clear_buffer
Otherwise an uninitialized value can be returned if
amdgpu_res_cleared returns true for all regions.
Possibly closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3812
(cherry picked from commit 7c62aacc3b452f73a1284198c81551035fac6d71) |
| A vulnerability in danny-avila/librechat version 0.7.9 allows for HTML injection via the Accept-Language header. When a logged-in user sends an HTTP GET request with a crafted Accept-Language header, arbitrary HTML can be injected into the <html lang=""> tag of the response. This can lead to potential security risks such as cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. |
| .NET Framework Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| HCL Nomad server on Domino did not configure certain HTTP Security headers by default which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. |
| A vulnerability in DSP driver prior to SMR Mar-2021 Release 1 allows attackers load arbitrary ELF libraries inside DSP. |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.20, 3.1.18, and 3.2.3, a possible information disclosure vulnerability existed in `Rack::Sendfile` when running behind a proxy that supports `x-sendfile` headers (such as Nginx). Specially crafted headers could cause `Rack::Sendfile` to miscommunicate with the proxy and trigger unintended internal requests, potentially bypassing proxy-level access restrictions. When `Rack::Sendfile` received untrusted `x-sendfile-type` or `x-accel-mapping` headers from a client, it would interpret them as proxy configuration directives. This could cause the middleware to send a "redirect" response to the proxy, prompting it to reissue a new internal request that was not subject to the proxy's access controls. An attacker could exploit this by setting a crafted `x-sendfile-type: x-accel-redirect` header, setting a crafted `x-accel-mapping` header, and requesting a path that qualifies for proxy-based acceleration. Attackers could bypass proxy-enforced restrictions and access internal endpoints intended to be protected (such as administrative pages). The vulnerability did not allow arbitrary file reads but could expose sensitive application routes. This issue only affected systems meeting all of the following conditions: The application used `Rack::Sendfile` with a proxy that supports `x-accel-redirect` (e.g., Nginx); the proxy did **not** always set or remove the `x-sendfile-type` and `x-accel-mapping` headers; and the application exposed an endpoint that returned a body responding to `.to_path`. Users should upgrade to Rack versions 2.2.20, 3.1.18, or 3.2.3, which require explicit configuration to enable `x-accel-redirect`. Alternatively, configure the proxy to always set or strip the header, or in Rails applications, disable sendfile completely. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix cpufreq_policy ref counting
amd_pstate_update_limits() takes a cpufreq_policy reference but doesn't
decrement the refcount in one of the exit paths, fix that. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Salesforce Tableau Server on Windows, Linux (EPS Server modules) allows Resource Location Spoofing. This issue affects Tableau Server: before 2025.1.3, before 2024.2.12, before 2023.3.19. |
| Mattermost Server versions 10.5.x <= 10.5.9 utilizing the Agents plugin fail to reject empty request bodies which allows users to trick users into clicking malicious links via post actions |
| HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An attacker can exploit improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Salesforce Tableau Server allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects Tableau Server: from 2023.3 through 2023.3.5. |
