Export limit exceeded: 421198 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (17027 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-0071 | 3 Microsoft, Mozilla, Redhat | 5 Windows, Firefox, Seamonkey and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox before 3.5.19 and 3.6.x before 3.6.17, Thunderbird before 3.1.10, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.14 on Windows allows remote attackers to determine the existence of arbitrary files, and possibly load resources, via vectors involving a resource: URL. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0077 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 4 Firefox, Seamonkey, Thunderbird and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox 3.5.x before 3.5.19 and 3.6.x before 3.6.17, Thunderbird before 3.1.10, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.14 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-0072, CVE-2011-0074, CVE-2011-0075, and CVE-2011-0078. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0413 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 2 Dhcp, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The DHCPv6 server in ISC DHCP 4.0.x and 4.1.x before 4.1.2-P1, 4.0-ESV and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R1, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1b1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon crash) by sending a message over IPv6 for a declined and abandoned address. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1202 | 3 Google, Redhat, Xmlsoft | 3 Chrome, Enterprise Linux, Libxslt | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The xsltGenerateIdFunction function in functions.c in libxslt 1.1.26 and earlier, as used in Google Chrome before 10.0.648.127 and other products, allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information about heap memory addresses via an XML document containing a call to the XSLT generate-id XPath function. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4397 | 2 Feep, Redhat | 2 Libtar, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in the th_read function in lib/block.c in libtar before 1.2.20 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long (1) name or (2) link in an archive, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1710 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 6 Firefox, Seamonkey, Thunderbird and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The crypto.generateCRMFRequest function in Mozilla Firefox before 23.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.8, Thunderbird before 17.0.8, Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.8, and SeaMonkey before 2.20 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript code or conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via vectors related to Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF) request generation. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1670 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 5 Firefox, Thunderbird, Thunderbird Esr and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 21.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.6, Thunderbird before 17.0.6, and Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.6 does not prevent acquisition of chrome privileges during calls to content level constructors, which allows remote attackers to bypass certain read-only restrictions and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted web site. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5166 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 3 Bind, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.6-P4, 9.8.x before 9.8.3-P4, 9.9.x before 9.9.1-P4, and 9.4-ESV and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R7-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (named daemon hang) via unspecified combinations of resource records. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4244 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 3 Bind, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.6-P3, 9.8.x before 9.8.3-P3, 9.9.x before 9.9.1-P3, and 9.4-ESV and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R7-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and named daemon exit) via a query for a long resource record. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2149 | 3 Apache, Libwpd, Redhat | 5 Openoffice.org, Libwpd, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The WPXContentListener::_closeTableRow function in WPXContentListener.cpp in libwpd 0.8.8, as used by OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.4, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Wordperfect .WPD document that causes a negative array index to be used. NOTE: some sources report this issue as an integer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1964 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 5 Firefox, Seamonkey, Thunderbird and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The certificate-warning functionality in browser/components/certerror/content/aboutCertError.xhtml in Mozilla Firefox 4.x through 12.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.6, Thunderbird 5.0 through 12.0, Thunderbird ESR 10.x before 10.0.6, and SeaMonkey before 2.10 does not properly handle attempted clickjacking of the about:certerror page, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trick users into adding an unintended exception via an IFRAME element. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1946 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 5 Firefox, Seamonkey, Thunderbird and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in the nsINode::ReplaceOrInsertBefore function in Mozilla Firefox 4.x through 12.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.5, Thunderbird 5.0 through 12.0, Thunderbird ESR 10.x before 10.0.5, and SeaMonkey before 2.10 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via document changes involving replacement or insertion of a node. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1940 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 5 Firefox, Seamonkey, Thunderbird and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in the nsFrameList::FirstChild function in Mozilla Firefox 4.x through 12.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.5, Thunderbird 5.0 through 12.0, Thunderbird ESR 10.x before 10.0.5, and SeaMonkey before 2.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption and application crash) by changing the size of a container of absolutely positioned elements in a column. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3551 | 2 Redhat, Sun | 7 Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite, Rhel Extras and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Networking component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21, 5.0 Update 25, and 1.4.2_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3553 | 2 Redhat, Sun | 7 Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite, Rhel Extras and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Swing component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21, 5.0 Update 25, 1.4.2_27, and 1.3.1_28 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable downstream vendor that this is related to unsafe reflection involving the UIDefault.ProxyLazyValue class. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3554 | 2 Redhat, Sun | 5 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Extras, Jdk and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the CORBA component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21, 5.0 Update 25, 1.4.2_27, and 1.3.1_28 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable downstream vendor that this is related to "permissions granted to certain system objects." | ||||
| CVE-2010-3557 | 2 Redhat, Sun | 7 Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite, Rhel Extras and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Swing component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21, 5.0 Update 25, 1.4.2_27, and 1.3.1_28 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable downstream vendor that this is related to the modification of "behavior and state of certain JDK classes" and "mutable static." | ||||
| CVE-2010-3561 | 2 Redhat, Sun | 4 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Extras, Jdk and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the CORBA component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21 and 5.0 Update 25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable downstream vendor that this involves the use of the privileged accept method in the ServerSocket class, which does not limit which hosts can connect and allows remote attackers to bypass intended network access restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3562 | 2 Redhat, Sun | 7 Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite, Rhel Extras and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21, 5.0 Update 25, 1.4.2_27, and 1.3.1_28 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable downstream vendor that this is a double free vulnerability in IndexColorModel that allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3564 | 2 Oracle, Redhat | 2 Sun Products Suite, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Messaging Server (Sun Java System Messaging Server) component in Oracle Sun Products Suite 7.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Webmail. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable downstream vendor that the Kerberos implementation does not properly check AP-REQ requests, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service in the JVM. NOTE: CVE has not investigated the apparent discrepancy between the two vendors regarding the consequences of this issue. | ||||