| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IPplan 4.91a allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the password, (2) add users, or (3) delete users via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Transmission 1.5 before 1.53 and 1.6 before 1.61 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Network Management Card (NMC) on American Power Conversion (APC) Switched Rack PDU (aka Rack Mount Power Distribution) devices and other devices allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of (1) administrator or (2) device users for requests that create new administrative users or have unspecified other impact. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in FreePBX 2.5.1, and other 2.4.x, 2.5.x, and pre-release 2.6.x versions, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that create a new admin account or have unspecified other impact. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Your_account module in CMSphp 0.21 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change an administrator password via the pseudo, pwd, and uid parameters in an admin_info_user_verif action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in am.pl in SQL-Ledger 2.8.24 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change a password via the login, new_password, and confirm_password parameters in a preferences action. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the t3lib_div::quoteJSvalue API function in TYPO3 4.0.13 and earlier, 4.1.x before 4.1.13, 4.2.x before 4.2.10, and 4.3.x before 4.3beta2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to the sanitizing algorithm. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shared Sign-On 5.x and 6.x, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in sample code in the XenServer Resource Kit in Citrix XenCenterWeb allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for (1) requests that change the password via the username parameter to config/changepw.php or (2) stop a virtual machine via the stop_vmname parameter to hardstopvm.php. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Open redirect vulnerability in Simplenews Statistics 6.x before 6.x-2.0, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Simplenews Statistics 6.x before 6.x-2.0, a module for Drupal, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Fivestar module 5.x-1.x before 5.x-1.14 and 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.14, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that cast votes. |
| The AutoCatSet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the autocatset_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger automatic recategorization of posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Comment Info Detector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the options.php file when handling form submissions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Disable Content Editor For Specific Template plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on template configuration updates. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add or delete template configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| A privacy issue was addressed with improved handling of user preferences. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.1 and iPadOS 26.1, macOS Tahoe 26.1, visionOS 26.1, watchOS 26.1. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.2, macOS Sonoma 14.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.1. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
| The SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4. |
| The Add Google Social Profiles to Knowledge Graph Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's Knowledge Graph settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
